[quote=“icecool2, post:2, topic:8346”]
Welcome to the club :Welcome)[/quote]
[quote=“beadlocked450r, post:8, topic:8346”]
Oh yea :Welcome)to the site[/quote]
Thanks, I’ve been lurking since the frag swap. Karen asking for posts inspired me to document when I’m working on here.
Yeah, I’ve been reading, apparently the gravity flow rates from glass-holes.com are a totally different thing than flow rates at a full siphon. I think I’ll be fine with the 1" bulkhead.
[quote=“houndsbayman, post:5, topic:8346”]
Don’t really understand what you mean by a “dry emergency, wet skim”
Why not just use both 1" bulkheads for drains and both 3/4" for returns. That gives you 600 GPH[/quote]
I want to do a Bean Animal drain system in this tank. I tried a Herbie in my 60g, and it’s ok, but a little finicky and not quite silent. I’m trying to improve with this build and get it really nice and quiet, along with the added fail safe.
The idea is that one pipe takes a full siphon to handle most of the drain. A second takes a partial siphon, just enough to do a little surface skimming. That second pipe keeps the system in balance. Small fluctuations in the output of the return pump are handled by that second “wet skim” pipe. Finally, the “dry emergency” is a pipe up above the normal level of the water. It’s designed as a fail safe. If the full siphon clogs, the wet skim will convert to a full siphon and handle the water. If - by some chance - both the siphon and the wet skim clog, the dry emergency will become a full siphon when water reaches that level and keep your tank from overflowing until you clear the clogs.
I probably would be fine with the 1" drains and 3/4" returns, I just feel better knowing I have a system in place to limit the risk.