OK How about a QT debate.....

As Jon mentioned in his rebutle to my wanting to start this thread…He is correct I have lost Hundreds if not Thousands of dollars worth of fish…Contrary to what some might feel I don’t not enjoy losing fish and don’t just want to go out and buy more because I am some rich guy…That is so far from the truth I will have my wife explain that to you if you believe that…

Now here is a long story short…I have torn down my 300 twice now to remove and try to QT my fish and leave the tank fallow for 12 weeks…The first time I was informed that leaving my eels in the tank would be fine because they can not host ich. Well was that a mistake after leaving the tank with just the eels for 12 weeks I started to restock with fish purchased from a vet that treats all fish in chloriquine for several weeks prior to offering them for sale…Well after adding a yellow and purple tank purchased from this vet…Guess what ICH!!! So I tear down the tank again and get a 125 to use as a treatment tank. I lost all but my 2 black and white clowns. I leave the clowns out of the main tank for yet another 12 weeks and sell the eels to ECA. OK I have this 125 now that has been running for a few months so I will use it as a QT. I get a small multi colored pygmy angel from NY Aquatic along with a coris wrasse and a hybrid blue angel from ECA. They all go thru an extensive 10 week QT period getting treated with Cupramine at .5 for 4 weeks and prazipro after the cuprmaine was done for a week. I then put them in my main tank. All goes well and to this day all fish are spot free and doing well. OK I get a crosshatch trigger from a diver in Hawaii and again QT and treat just like I did the other fish. After about 10 weeks in QT I put him in my main tank on Friday. Guess what…2 days ago I notice he has white spots on him…Apparently all the time and effort I have been putting in to QT was for nothing…So now, if what this crosshatch has on him is indeed ich, my main tank is infected again…I am NOT tearing down this tank again for a third time so this time I have decided to let nature take its course. I am continuing to keep my water quallity superb and my fish well fed. Time will tell what happens. I may have missed some things in this story because I am trying to keep it as short as I can. But I did lose a few fish in QT while I was learning the proper technique.
I will continue to QT fish but will not treat unless needed because they are going to go in a tank that has had ich. I am just going to hope that me QTing is helping the fish get strong before they go into the main tank so hopefully they can fight it off…So I am not certain QT is all its cracked up to be at this very moment. I am actually very frustrated in the entire situation. SO lets hear some thoughts and opinions from people.

to my knowledge the “ich” parasite has a 6 month life cycle. i’m assuming to be safe you would need to QT the new fish for that period to be safe.

IMO QTing has its benefits and drawbacks, if you can do it, I think it is good, but it isn’t going to stop everything. With that being said I don’t really QT, but have before.
Don’t forget QT isn’t only for fish but for coral as well, which can be much more costly and harder to fix if you get some undesirables in the tank.

Hopefully folks can add to the below lists…
Some benefits
QT allows your livestock (fish & coral) to get acclimated to your environment and into a healthier environment without threat of other livestock (corals & fish) competing with them for space and food in their weakened (from transport/new environ) state.
QT also allows you to spot feed with out threat as mentioned above
QT also allows you to observe the overall health and any possible disease on the livestock and gives you the ability to treat independent of other livestock (if necessary)

Drawbacks
You’ve got to setup another tank, lights, ect.
You’ve got to manage another tank (SG, params, ect.)
If keeping difficult corals the above two get even more important, as well as the fact that they should be matched fairly closely to your end DT environment
You don’t get to enjoy your purchase in its final environment for another X weeks while in QT
You may not catch all diseases in QT or your QT setup may not be sufficient for all creatures for some time.
You can be adding more stress moving the livestock from tank to tank.

With all that said, I believe I’ve had ich in my tank before. I haven’t taken the tank down or treated individual fish. Instead I just tried to keep parameters stable and a healthy diet for the livestock and the signs of ich have faded.

HTH

[quote=“andrewk529, post:2, topic:2941”]
to my knowledge the “ich” parasite has a 6 month life cycle. i’m assuming to be safe you would need to QT the new fish for that period to be safe.[/quote]

I would love to see were you got that information from. All the reading I have done states 6-8 weeks

Ive posted my opinion several times at length before and dont have the time to do so again. ill share a couple of quick thoughts.

QT is good if done right but rarely done right. A large well established QT is a good thing if you have the space. a small tank temporarily set-up for QT will just as likely kill the fish as it will cure it.

treating a fish prophylacticly for diseases that are not presenting symptoms causes undue stress especially coupled with hypo conditions. some people are of the mind that if a fish dies in QT its because it was sick. i personally believe that a lot of fish likely die in QT because of QT and no other reason(in the case of improper QT setup). anecdotal evidence? google Royal Grammas and Hypo salinity. These poor guys are killed constantly by QT nuts because they fish doesn’t handle hypo very well. If hypo can impact one fish so negatively i would imagine that it has some effect on all fish to some degree(no proof here guys).

question? does QT prevent bacterial infections? which i believe are contagious? what about other diseases other than ich? does copper, cupramine, etc treat all possible pathogens? does it guarantee that no fish will ever succumb to disease? does treating newly purchased fish(IE already stressed from transit)aggressively and prophylactic contribute to stress and death?

if i had the space i would set up a QT if for no other reason than those you suggested about monitoring the fish and making sure it eats and acclimates properly. as it stands i do not QT and i know ich is in my tank. my regal tang has broke out with ich twice in two years. both times it was BAD. both times she fully recovered within a couple of days with no intervention on my part and no other fish presented symptoms. that i can recall Ive only last one fish due to disease in the last couple of years and that was a CBB that contracted a bacterial infection within a week or two after being introduced and literally died within 24hrs of showing symptoms. it could be luck. my tank could be a ticking time bomb. i might one day go through what you went through and curse my stupidity. as of right now though i have a lot of confidence in a fish’s immune system and their ability to fight off disease in a tank with ideal conditions and good husbandry. again. nothing more than anecdotal. Ive seen it with my own eyes twice. the first time i was scared $hitl3$$ that i was going to lose all my fish. the second time i didn’t lose a minutes sleep. i was confident that all would be well and it was. again, could just be dumb luck. Just for Jon: I believe QT procedures are a good thing when done properly. I would recommend everyone to QT their animals if you can provide a proper setup. However, i still feel that QT will produce causalities that one might not otherwise experience without QT especially with more delicate species.

All of these opinions are based on my personal experience. I do not have a journal article handy to support my conclusions. The only evidence i offer is anecdotal. If i lose an entire tank to disease i will be sure not to share it with everyone!

sorry about the 3rd grade spelling and grammar. on cell.

rbu1, Here is a thread I started a while ago on Ich, which inevitably led to a QT discussion. I feel most of the points made in the thread by everyone are still valid.

http://delreefclub.org/index.php?option=com_smf&Itemid=28&topic=971.0

Shawn,

After going thru all that I have I am starting to feel similar to you. Even though I did have a proper QT and feel fairly confident in my technique, its obvious something went wrong…I hope I have the same luck as you with the fish being able to fight it off…I was told that by QTing fish you are giving them a better chance when you place them in a tank that has ich. Because of the QT period they are able to eat well and get fairly healthy before you put them in the ich riden tank. Time will tell!!!

Ian,
Thanks for the link.

I wanted to add some pictures to the thread…Here is the area on the head. I had some discussions with people about the indentations (larger spots) and the consensus was they were injuries from the PVC pipe. The smaller spots all around the top of the head are my assumption to be ich…

The second photo shows a white patch that I discovered on him yesterday when I got home from work…Again not positive on what the heck this is my assumption is an injury from rock or something…

The third pic is of my blue angel hybrid…He has been in the main tank for almost 2 months without a spec on him. Some white areas on his fins but the thought was it was just scares from the flukes…

Keep in mind all of these fish have been thru a 8-10 week QT and have all been treated with cupramine and prazipro.

drool!!!

makes me want to add the xhatches back to my stocking list! ive literally had them on and off a dozen times but finally decided to stay with all realtively small fish. georgeous fish!!

[quote=“rbu1, post:4, topic:2941”]

[quote=“andrewk529, post:2, topic:2941”]
to my knowledge the “ich” parasite has a 6 month life cycle. i’m assuming to be safe you would need to QT the new fish for that period to be safe.[/quote]

I would love to see were you got that information from. All the reading I have done states 6-8 weeks[/quote]

i’ll find the info when i get off later tonight. i might be mistaken, but i do remember reading somewhere that the eggs of the protozoan can persist for 6 months in a closed system.

[quote=“logans_daddy, post:10, topic:2941”]
drool!!!

makes me want to add the xhatches back to my stocking list! ive literally had them on and off a dozen times but finally decided to stay with all realtively small fish. georgeous fish!![/quote]

THanks I hope your logic is correct and he pulls thru…You should see the female I have in QT right now…She is only about 3 inches…Real small…I will post a pic…

Female currently in QT…She is real small. Never saw anything as small as her.

THanks I hope your logic is correct and he pulls thru
no pressure there!! >LOL<

i will point out one thing that i have noticed. it seems, at least to me, that QT coupled with the practice of treating diseases prophylacticly seems to be more popular with FOWLR hobbyists than reefers. This makes sense considering the larger, oftentimes more expensive fish as well as the popularity of surgeonfish in these systems. The reason i point this out is because a lot of FOWLR system owners dont even own an NO3 testkit let alone test for them. I think water quality goes along way in helping these guys fight off disease. I have no proof of course but it seems to me that incidents of losing an entire tank full of fish to diesease seem to be much more prevalent in the FOWLR community than among reefers. To be honest, i cant even think of one time where a hobbyist with an SPS system(i say SPS because of inherit water quality)lost all of their fish due to disease. Im sure its happened. Just doesnt seem very common.

Bill - i know your system isnt FOWLR and i cant recall if you have every mentioned NO3 or PO4 levels. Im not suggesting in any way that your water quality is related to what happened. Im only suggesting that i feel that water quality is related to the ability a fish has to fight off and recover from illness. Again, purely anecdotal.

Absolutely stunning!!

Did you happen to get them from Les? If so, would you mind pm’ing me how much you paid for the pair?

No I did not get them from Les. I actually got him from hawaiisaltwaterfish.com and the female from a fellow reefer tha wanted to get rid of her. She came from NY Aquatic.

I have not tested nitrates in a long time, but last time I did it was 0…I have never tested for Phosphates because I have never seen a reason to. I have no sps and “knock on wood” no algae issues. I do change 50 gallons of water weekly and run a rather large reactor full of carbon and one half full of GFO. The carbon gets changed monthly and the GFO every other month. I would call my water quality fairly good.

Not sure if you saw my tank. But here is a semi recent pic…

Wow love these fish… I love that angel…

First off it may be helpful if this thread were to ever get long to split comments on QTing corals vs QTing fish. While they can very well be related at times for most hobbyist they would be two completely different animals. Pun intended :wink:
Secondly before getting into much debate on the value of QTing and all that I would like to try to help with the concerns of the origin of this post. Rbu1 who helped you develop your QT procedure? Did you follow someone’s recommendation online or another hobbyist? Something out of a book? Or was it just that you found a chemical that would supposedly kill ich and used it based on the product specifications?
Were any corals, macro algae, clean up crew, other inverts, or anything else wet at all added to the tank besides the fish? To maintain a 100% “ich free” environment these must be kept in a fish free tank for at least a couple of months.
Copper is a very harsh treatment on the animals. I personally use Hyposalinity which is not at all for the casual hobbyist, but you may consider. As long as the nutrients are kept low and the pH is kept steady through regular additions of Sodium carbonate, you would be surprised how effect it is and how well the animals pull through it.
The first thing I usually point people at is “leebca”s articles on QT and Cryptocaryon. Try a google search. They can be found on ReefFrontiers, but the site requires you to register, for free, in order to view them. Most people decide it’s not worth the effort or get to relaxed in keeping up with what they learned the need to do and things don’t go perfectly. After that point people can either realize the fact in what they read or should admit that it wasn’t in their minds worth the effort.
If a fish is injured or stressed significantly or just arriving from the wild I do think it is best to keep it in stable conditions before anything else. Not just stable conditions fighting with 3 other fish though, and isolated chamber is best.
I haven’t lost a fish in my tanks in the last couple years(except jumpers likely due to aggression) even with very relaxed maintenance, crazy swings in chemistry, and even some crazy events like both high and low salinity and temperatures. Not a single white spot. Have also never seen my fish attempt to scratch themselves on rock, breath heavy, or anything else.

[quote=“andrewk529, post:2, topic:2941”]
to my knowledge the “ich” parasite has a 6 month life cycle.[/quote]

Source? I could provide plenty which would argue most strains of Cryptocaryon seen have a life cycle less than 1/3 that long.

One thing I would comment on your response Ian is that I agree it is important with more difficult corals to maintain parameters with harder to keep corals, but would like to mention it is easier. Imagine the bioload a 1” frag of acropora puts on a 20gallon tank! Oh wait, immeasurable. Most people have no idea how easy it is to keep a small tank if you do not feed it.
Another comment I would make is the amount of light required. Few corals we commonly keep will die quickly or even be stressed significantly by low light. You should see how little light I use on my coral QT tanks.

“You don’t get to enjoy your purchase in its final environment for another X weeks while in QT”
No, not in its final environment, but my animals are still pretty usually while they are in QT.

I too don’t have a lot of time to get into detail, but I agree with a lot of what Shawn said. Most people mess up QT and due it improperly. That being said most people kill several fish no matter what when they start in the hobby. This doesn’t mean that the practice of fish keeping is unethical or should be stopped or that keeping the fish in a glass box is responsible. People need to do the proper research and really figure out what they are doing before they attempt it as with anything in the hobby. Most newbies should not try hyposalinity.

“my regal tang has broke out with ich twice in two years. both times it was BAD.”
Shawn I’m sorry to hear your fish and you went through this. It is rough watching an animal we care about in pain. This is one of the reasons why I strive to maintain an environment free of ich. While one could argue it isn’t natural for them to go through hypo, or for the tank to be free of ich for that matter, but I also believe it is not natural for fish to get badly covered in ich. In the wild they are not trapped in an area concentrated with ich and many spend much of their time further away from the substrate. They also have cleaner stations available to them which rid them of many other pests which in captivity would further weaken the animal.
Something that keeps me doing what I do is the, “Old tank syndrome” factor. Shit happens and when you consider all the possible things that could go wrong with a marine aquarium… just give it time. I would rather ich not be present when something happens.
The average size of most fish in the wild would see massive to most aquarist. To me this is a shame and I believe as the hobby and humanity evolve I hope this opinion is shared by many more. Most of the industry would label juvenile fish as small, medium, and large and rarely even know what an adult looks like. This is even now when old fisherman tell about how much larger the fish used to be and are just not any more due to humanity.

[quote=“rbu1, post:7, topic:2941”]
I was told that by QTing fish you are giving them a better chance when you place them in a tank that has ich. Because of the QT period they are able to eat well and get fairly healthy before you put them in the ich riden tank. [/quote]

I strongly believe this and doubt anyone would disagree. Some may argue that it is not worth the time and effort, the same people should realize if their fish gets ill that they made a decision which put that fish in the position it is in. Their lives are in our hands.

Jon,

I have done a great deal of research on the QT process and have read all the articles by Lee. I have been taking the advice of several people that have been in the hobby and been QTing probably before you and I were born. I am not saying Copps from RC is a real old guy but he really know his stuff when it comes to the treatment of fish. I met him thru RC and have bothered him from time to time for advice. Believe me I have done my homework when it comes to QT. I know the, “don’t add anything wet to your tank” unless its been thru QT and have also followed that by not adding anything to the tank but QT’d fish after the fallow period. I made sure I added my inverts prior to starting my 3 month fallow period…
Here is my proceudure in a nutshell…

I was using a 125 as a treatment tank but have since down sized to a 30 long. I will share my instructions using the 125…

I would add a fish to the tank that was free of cuprmaine via a 50 gallon water change and running carbon and cuprisorb for a week prior to adding the fish…

I then would add the fish to the QT and just monitor until I could get the fish eating well.
Then I would do a dose of prazipro (1 oz) for about 5 days then do a large water change 50 gallons followed by a week of carbon. As long as the fish is still acting and eating normally and only after the weeek of medicine free water would I then start to dose Cuprmaine.
My total dosage amount for the cuprmaine for the 125 was 24ml that would get me to the .5 treatment level. I would add cuprmaine to the tank at a rate of 6ml every couple days just to make sure the fish was acting and eating after introducing copper. Provided the fish continued to eat and act normal I would continue to add the cuprmaine till the 24ml was added and the level was reading .5 That process may take a little over a week because I liked adding the cupramine real slow. After getting to the .5 level I would test every couple days with a salifert kit to make sure I was staying in the .5 range. This QT is bare bottom with just PVC pipe. After 3 weeks and a couple days I would do a large water change followed by carbon and cuprisorb to remove the copper after another week the fish would go in the main tank. My QT process takes about 10 weeks…Trust me I did my home work and was doing everything by the book…Don’t know what the heck happened maybe the cupramine is not all its cracked up to be…Believe me I went thru a great deal of trouble to try and do the right thing with this QT process. So you can’t begin to imagine how frustrated I am with this hobby right now!!!